欢迎访问机床与液压官方网站!

咨询热线:020-32385312 32385313 RSS EMAIL-ALERT
基于流固耦合的螺旋桨性能数值对比分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

西江多用途船高效螺旋桨研制


Numerical Comparison Analysis of Propeller Performance Based on Fluid Solid Coupling
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究不同流固耦合方法对螺旋桨水动力及强度的影响。首先建立螺旋桨模型,对模型进行前处理,在Workbench平台中分别采用单向与双向流固耦合方法,对某型螺旋桨在不同进速下敞水性能、表面压力分布、等效应力和变形进行计算分析与比较,得到敞水性能对比曲线、不同截面处压力分布对比曲线以及应力和变形随桨叶半径变化的对比曲线。结果表明:在低进速系数下,双向流固耦合计算的敞水性能结果精确度高于单向流固耦合,随着进速系数增加,两种方法的计算值差距越来越小;单向流固耦合所得到的压力峰值高于双向流固耦合,但是采用双向流固耦合所得到的压力分布更均匀;单向流固耦合所得应力与变形峰值高于双向流固耦合,随着进速系数的增大,两种流固耦合方法计算值偏差有增大的趋势。

    Abstract:

    In order to investigate the influences of different fluid solid coupling method on hydrodynamic propeller and strength, firstly, the propeller model is established. The model was pretreated using oneway and twoway flow solid coupling (FSI) method in the Workbench platform, to a certain type of propeller in different velocity of open water, surface pressure distribution, stress equivalent calculation and comparative analysis and deformation, to get the open water performance curves, curves of different crosssection pressure distribution curves and stress and deformation changes with the blade radius. The results show that: in the low velocity coefficient, open water performance results of the twoway FSI calculation accuracy is higher than that of unidirectional FSI, with the speed coefficient increases, the gap of two methods of calculating value is getting smaller and smaller; the peak pressure of oneway FSI is higher than the twoway FSI, but the twoway FSI by pressure is more uniform in distribution; unidirectional flow FSI by the stress and deformation peak is higher than the twoway FSI, with the increase of inlet velocity coefficient, two kinds of FSI method to calculate the deviation is increased.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

安邦,张和牧,朱汉华,范世东,张梦达.基于流固耦合的螺旋桨性能数值对比分析[J].机床与液压,2018,46(17):155-160.
. Numerical Comparison Analysis of Propeller Performance Based on Fluid Solid Coupling[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics,2018,46(17):155-160

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-07-09
  • 出版日期: