欢迎访问机床与液压官方网站!

咨询热线:020-32385312 32385313 RSS EMAIL-ALERT
基于AMESim的传统悬架与油气悬架性能对比分析研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Comparative Analysis on the Traditional Suspension and Hydro-pneumatic Suspension Based on AMESim
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于AMESim软件建立了1/4车辆传统悬架与油气悬架模型,并基于积分白噪声法建立C级路面不平度模型,通过仿真实验对比分析传统悬架与油气悬架簧上质量与簧下质量垂向振动位移、速度、加速度及加速度均方根值等性能。结果表明:油气悬架较“弹簧+阻尼减振器”结构的传统悬架具有更好的减振效果,能够进一步改善车辆行驶平顺性,为油气悬架车辆行驶平顺性性能改善及设计提供理论指导。

    Abstract:

    Based on AMESim software, a traditional suspension and a hydro-pneumatic suspension of 1/4 vehicle model were modeled. C-class road roughness model was modeled based on the method of integral white noise. By simulation experiments, the sprung mass and unsprung mass vertical vibration displacement, velocity, acceleration and acceleration rMS value and other properties of the traditional spring suspension and hydropneumatic suspension were compared. The results show that: compared with traditional suspension with “spring+shock absorber of damping” structure, hydrosuspension suspension can be further improved vehicle ride comfort for it has a better damping effect. The analytical conclusion can offer theory guide to improve and design performance of vehicle ride comfort.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

程祥瑞,高钦和.基于AMESim的传统悬架与油气悬架性能对比分析研究[J].机床与液压,2017,45(16):72-74.
. Comparative Analysis on the Traditional Suspension and Hydro-pneumatic Suspension Based on AMESim[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics,2017,45(16):72-74

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-03-08
  • 出版日期: