文章摘要
程祥瑞,高钦和.基于AMESim的传统悬架与油气悬架性能对比分析研究[J].机床与液压,2017,45(16):72-74
基于AMESim的传统悬架与油气悬架性能对比分析研究
Comparative Analysis on the Traditional Suspension and Hydro-pneumatic Suspension Based on AMESim
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2017.16.020
中文关键词: AMESim仿真  传统悬架  油气悬架  行驶平顺性
英文关键词: AMESim simulation  Traditional suspension  Hydro-pneumatic suspension  Vehicle ride comfort
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
程祥瑞 火箭军工程大学兵器发射理论与技术军队重点学科实验室 3100622856@qq.com 
高钦和 火箭军工程大学兵器发射理论与技术军队重点学科实验室  
摘要点击次数: 55
全文下载次数: 
中文摘要:
      基于AMESim软件建立了1/4车辆传统悬架与油气悬架模型,并基于积分白噪声法建立C级路面不平度模型,通过仿真实验对比分析传统悬架与油气悬架簧上质量与簧下质量垂向振动位移、速度、加速度及加速度均方根值等性能。结果表明:油气悬架较“弹簧+阻尼减振器”结构的传统悬架具有更好的减振效果,能够进一步改善车辆行驶平顺性,为油气悬架车辆行驶平顺性性能改善及设计提供理论指导。
英文摘要:
      Based on AMESim software, a traditional suspension and a hydro-pneumatic suspension of 1/4 vehicle model were modeled. C-class road roughness model was modeled based on the method of integral white noise. By simulation experiments, the sprung mass and unsprung mass vertical vibration displacement, velocity, acceleration and acceleration rMS value and other properties of the traditional spring suspension and hydro pneumatic suspension were compared. The results show that: compared with traditional suspension with “spring+shock absorber of damping” structure, hydro suspension suspension can be further improved vehicle ride comfort for it has a better damping effect. The analytical conclusion can offer theory guide to improve and design performance of vehicle ride comfort.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮