欢迎访问机床与液压官方网站!

咨询热线:020-32385312 32385313 RSS EMAIL-ALERT
2-PRR并联机构的静刚度试验研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

陕西理工学院科技基金资助项目(42902);陕西教育厅科学研究计划项目(14JK1163)


Experimenatl Study in Static Stiffness Test of 2-PRR Parallel Mechanism
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在不考虑驱动电机刚度的条件下,分别在2PRR并联机构的连杆平面内的3个典型位置沿X和Z向分步加载,测量得到了在相应方向上的位移值,给出不同位置和方向上的刚度曲线, 并将所测的位移值与边界元法计算的位移解析值进行了比较。结果表明:在同一个测量点,Z向刚度明显比X向刚度大,在不同的测量点,其特定方向的刚度虽有变化,但刚度变化在同一数量级;实际测试的相对刚度值与边界元计算的理论刚度值的变化趋势一致。

    Abstract:

    Under conditions of without considering the stiffness of joint driving device itself, respectively, in 2PRR parallel mechanism connecting rod within the plane of the three typical locations along the X and Z to step loading, measurements were obtained in the corresponding direction displacement value. Stiffiness curves in different directions and locations were given, and the measured displacement and the displacement analytic values calcaulated by boundary element method were compared. The results show that in the same measuring point, the stiffness of Z is significantly greater than the stiffness of X. At the different measuring points, although the specific direction stiffness changed, but it is in the same order of magnitude. The relative stiffness value of the real test and the theory stiffness values of boundary element calculation have the same variation trend.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈纯,陈子玮,王庆梁,黄玉美.2-PRR并联机构的静刚度试验研究[J].机床与液压,2016,44(5):84-87.
. Experimenatl Study in Static Stiffness Test of 2-PRR Parallel Mechanism[J]. Machine Tool & Hydraulics,2016,44(5):84-87

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-05-05
  • 出版日期: