文章摘要
郑亚飞,阮鸿雁,丁建军,李海锋.Stewart并联机构液压系统控制策略的分析与研究[J].机床与液压,2018,46(9):56-60
Stewart并联机构液压系统控制策略的分析与研究
Analysis and Research on Control Strategy of Hydraulic System of Stewart Parallel Mechanism
  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3881.2018.09.013
中文关键词: Stewart并联机构  液压控制系统  控制策略  性能判定
英文关键词: Stewart parallel mechanism  Hydraulic control system  Control strategy  Performance determination
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
郑亚飞 江苏大学机械工程学院 zhengyafei456@163.com 
阮鸿雁 江苏大学机械工程学院  
丁建军 江苏大学机械工程学院  
李海锋 江苏大学机械工程学院  
摘要点击次数: 66
全文下载次数: 
中文摘要:
      Stewart并联机构存在多种驱动方式,不同驱动方式其控制性能亦具有很大的区别。在针对Stewart并联机构进行结构分析的基础上,完成液压系统控制策略的分析与研究,运用AMESIM液压分析软件完成并联机构液压控制系统的搭建,采用PID控制与H∞鲁棒控制策略并行连接,针对已求解的阀控缸控制系统的传递函数应用,得到液压缸伸缩杆位移曲线的变化,用于判断两种控制策略的优越性。结果显示在同频率阶段,H∞鲁棒控制的跟随效果优于PID控制。
英文摘要:
      he control performance of the Stewart parallel manipulator differs greatly depending on the so many different drive modes. Based on the structure analysis of the Stewart parallel mechanism, the control strategy of the hydraulic system has been analyzed and researched. The hydraulic control system of the parallel mechanism was built by AMESIM hydraulic analysis software, and connected in parallel by the Proportion Integral Derivative (PID) control and the H∞robust control strategy. The solved transfer function of the valve-controlled cylinder control system was applied to determine the superiority of the two control strategies by obtaining the varied displacement curve of the telescopic rod of the hydraulic cylinder. The results show that the tracking effect of H∞ robust control is better than PID control in the same frequency stage.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭

分享按钮